| Depth and Originality of Research |
Uncovers substantial information using multiple sources; demonstrates creative and persistent inquiry into a relatively obscure figure. |
Good research effort with a variety of sources; shows some originality or synthesis. |
Basic research conducted; sources are limited or lack depth. |
Minimal research; heavy reliance on a single source or includes unverifiable claims. |
| Critical Engagement with Fandom/History |
Strong contextualization of subject’s role in fandom or comics history; thoughtful reflection on cultural and historical dimensions. |
Includes relevant context with some critical reflection. |
Limited engagement with historical or fan context. |
Lacks meaningful contextualization or critical thinking. |
| Documentation and Citation |
Includes well-organized documentation (letters, obituaries, media, etc.) with proper attribution. |
Includes relevant documentation; mostly cited correctly. |
Some documentation included; inconsistent attribution. |
Little or no documentation; citations missing or unclear. |
| Structure and Presentation |
Professionally formatted and clearly written; appropriate use of headings, images, captions. |
Mostly well-organized with a few inconsistencies. |
Understandable but lacks polish or formatting. |
Difficult to follow; lacks structure or visual coherence. |